tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.comments2016-10-21T21:00:52.804+08:00AtheozoaAtheozoahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comBlogger72125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-12375519647836470562015-07-30T21:00:15.617+08:002015-07-30T21:00:15.617+08:00As a representative of the the egoistic-nihilist s...As a representative of the the egoistic-nihilist side I find that Humanism is definitely a religion, or maybe religion is a kind of ideology just like Humanism. In any case, the distinction is spurious. Science has no values, nor does nature, nor does 'humanity' have any intrinsic value or transindividual intrinsic demands. It's just a bunch of arbitrary cult memes scrambled together out of Christianity and Crypto-Protestant wankers from the Enlightenment.<br /><br />Rights don't exist, nobody owes anything to anyone, the world has no purpose or destiny, extinction is inevitable (second law of thermodynamics) and all values exist only as the values of specific individuals. There are wrong propisitions, but no false values. Humanism is pure wank with pseudo-scientific lipstick.<br /><br />This is especially patent when you notice that most Humanists know shit about philosophy or science and are just middle-brow wankers who think they're smarter than they really are. These morons know nothing about critical thinking, they just parrot whatever some black physicist on TV says. May as well be a Reverand for all the difference it makes.<br /><br />One of the problems with humanism is its unwillingness to ignore ineradicable human inequality and dysgenics; the masses can not be 'uplifted'. They will only drag everyone else down if you treat them like they matter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-85966473801295662282013-12-22T12:25:48.418+08:002013-12-22T12:25:48.418+08:00Common ancestry is evidenced by our genetics -- th...Common ancestry is evidenced by our genetics -- that is why we can build a phylogenetic tree from our genes. This tree is also congruent with the tree of life constructed from morphological evidence. Hence the "twin nested hierarchy". <br /><br />The unusual distinction you're trying to make here is the same old "micro vs macro" evolution. This arbitrary distinction is not scientific -- there is no reason to suppose that accumulative "microevolution" is barred from producing new species (speciation). Indeed, examples meeting the definition of what speciation is has already been observed.<br /><br />Granted they may not be deliberately lying, they're still guilty of spreading misinformation while making no effort to actually learn what the theory and facts of evolution encompasses. And that is still intellectually bankrupt.Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-29872026503050552392013-12-22T03:38:54.460+08:002013-12-22T03:38:54.460+08:00My apologies for the claim in that poster that Evo...My apologies for the claim in that poster that Evolution is false. When Theists talk of Evolution being false, they mean the Darwinian idea that everything has a common ancestor, but all Theists agree with what Scientists are discovering regarding small changes within a Species, to a Theist, this is not technically Evolution but rather Speciation. They agree with the Facts that are being discovered, just not the interpretation. Therefore they cannot be guilty of breaking the 9th commandment.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00244602744485700483noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-44667317687173367062012-08-05T17:48:22.222+08:002012-08-05T17:48:22.222+08:00The problem with religion, because it's been s...The problem with religion, because it's been sheltered from criticism, is that it allows people to believe en mass what only idiots or lunatics could believe in isolation. - Sam HarrisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-79424789730893823772012-05-27T00:19:25.913+08:002012-05-27T00:19:25.913+08:00Hi Kenny
Sure. Just link it back to this blog.
Y...Hi Kenny<br /><br />Sure. Just link it back to this blog.<br /><br />You can email me at atheozoa@gmail.com.<br /><br />I am wondering though, what pictures? I hardly have any pictures original to the blog...Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-18652189528975925982012-05-26T10:44:17.627+08:002012-05-26T10:44:17.627+08:00Hi Atheozoa,
I would like to use some of your res...Hi Atheozoa,<br /><br />I would like to use some of your resources (mainly pictures and quotes) for school debates as well as public forum areas. If you want, i could re-link the source back to you. <br /><br />How may i contact you?<br /><br />For your considerations. Thanks!<br /><br />KennyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-5670995377701637002012-04-15T15:56:12.142+08:002012-04-15T15:56:12.142+08:00Firstly, I don't read atheists books to "...Firstly, I don't read atheists books to "influence (me) to side atheism". Frankly, I've only gotten 4 "atheist" books - The God Delusion, God is not Great, and The End of Faith - because they were popular at the time. The fourth is Godless which I gotten to see what an ex-christian has to say. In general, those books are not what made me an atheist.<br /><br />Secondly, while the books were great, they aren't against the existence of "god" in general. They are either more specifically against the Abrahamic version of god or provide supplementary arguments against theism.<br /><br />Third. I'm not sure what you meant by "atheistic arguments can be refuted". As far as I'm concerned, there has always only been one core argument against theism: There is no evidence for the proposition. ALL other "atheistic" arguments are supplementary or against specific proposed versions of god.<br /><br />And seriously, Francis Collins? The one who basically makes the Moral argument? If I borrowed the book, then maybe.Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-21976691785475521132012-04-02T22:05:21.181+08:002012-04-02T22:05:21.181+08:00Hello. I agree with Terence here. I feel that athe...Hello. I agree with Terence here. I feel that atheist should not merely read books that influence you to side atheism. God is not great and the god delusion are very powerful arguements against the existence of God, however, without reading the christian side of the story, i feel that you may not be able to come to a wider worldview aside from atheistic arguements. I assure you that atheistic arguements can be refuted. Read Francis Collin's works. Along with G.k. Chesterton and perhaps C.S. Lewis's Mere christianityAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-40680311673795362742012-03-03T13:59:15.142+08:002012-03-03T13:59:15.142+08:00Yes, I noticed the same piece of news too. And res...Yes, I noticed the same piece of news too. And responded: http://atheozoa.blogspot.com/2012/03/pulling-jesus-out-of-fhm.htmlAtheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-50723268272986483222012-03-03T11:46:40.567+08:002012-03-03T11:46:40.567+08:00I might have to disagree with that. What it means ...I might have to disagree with that. What it means to be secular is to simply not to favor some/one religion over others/none. Being secular does not necessarily entail being devoid of religion.Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-89298824854493641182012-03-03T11:14:55.141+08:002012-03-03T11:14:55.141+08:00See http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singa...See http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_773245.html<br /><br />I wonder what you have to say about the FHM incident. Seriously, the christians are going too far...<br /><br />~qwertieAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-68500472309895798232012-03-03T11:05:39.180+08:002012-03-03T11:05:39.180+08:00Really...universities should disallow all religiou...Really...universities should disallow all religious activities on campuses because they are not theology colleges. Universities are supposed to be secular.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-1480054275470264292011-10-19T17:51:19.912+08:002011-10-19T17:51:19.912+08:00Thanks but I think you've directed your compli...Thanks but I think you've directed your compliments to the wrong person. I didn't create these videos.<br /><br />Your comments would be much appreciated by the uploader of these videos at http://www.youtube.com/user/lapkine77<br /><br />I'm just doing a little part in spreading the info. =)Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-62952696306644030712011-10-19T14:10:00.639+08:002011-10-19T14:10:00.639+08:00Nicely done...although I'm sure they won't...Nicely done...although I'm sure they won't listen. I'm not sure of your backgrounds in this matter but you have a wonderful job piecing together well thought out and credible answers to these, often misleading and purposefully erroneous, questions. <br /><br />I have left comments on the Creation Ministries website why they insist on asking "evolutionists" these questions without actually directing them towards actual evolutionists who have spent their careers in researching this subject. I know the answer of course....they simply want to make it seem as if evolution is nothing but a "belief system" (much like their own) that has no real scientific grounding. The best way to do this is to ask laymen and provide these questions in a pamphlet so that others can attempt to embarrass their high school science teachers who are also unable to see through the garbage which are these 15 questions to offer a knowledgeable answer.<br /><br />KUDOS!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-57916716474067849122011-10-16T10:45:19.806+08:002011-10-16T10:45:19.806+08:00Actually, thank you for this and your videos! =)Actually, thank you for this and your videos! =)Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-64578127706353468522011-10-16T08:15:53.049+08:002011-10-16T08:15:53.049+08:00I didn't think it was possible to feel more co...I didn't think it was possible to feel more contempt for that woman than I already did. This footage of Fischer in Singapore is nauseating. Thanks for posting this — I'll be publicising this scandalous event. All the best.TheraminTreeshttp://www.youtube.com/TheraminTreesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-37047693198725791882011-08-03T17:29:27.876+08:002011-08-03T17:29:27.876+08:00I wholeheartedly agree. But I also take issue with...I wholeheartedly agree. But I also take issue with the phrase "Since non-believers have no church, temple or mosque to go to". Like erm, it is assuming that non-believers have to actually go SOMEWHERE for....what? Pray? LOLs! But still, kudos to ST for coming up with this article. I must say I was quite disgusted with the article on 'godless youths'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-25413226653818508472011-08-02T10:27:49.601+08:002011-08-02T10:27:49.601+08:00I have no idea who's he referring to either.I have no idea who's he referring to either.Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-17175824320705045982011-08-02T01:19:50.376+08:002011-08-02T01:19:50.376+08:00"Until not so long ago, the secretary of the ..."Until not so long ago, the secretary of the British Humanist Association was an Anglican priest......"<br /><br />Eh?<br /><br />Who?Incredulity Serviceshttp://www.incredulity.org.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-80948023424813018332011-05-15T14:02:55.699+08:002011-05-15T14:02:55.699+08:00Provide your counterargument if you disagree. Anyt...Provide your counterargument if you disagree. Anything less, don't bother posting. Thanks.Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-2239804625769067912011-04-12T23:09:22.383+08:002011-04-12T23:09:22.383+08:00Where has been indicated that integration was sole...Where has been indicated that integration was solely a Muslim issue? Please show me, thanks.<br /><br />Look back at MM Lee's comments. He does not say nor imply that integration was a Muslim problem. He was making a comparison that Muslims seems to have more difficulty in integration compared to the other races/religions. This merely points out that Muslims are having more issues with integration NOT that they are the ONLY ones with issues. There is a huge difference there.<br /><br />Indeed, it is a national problem and it is everyone's responsibility. It doesn't help if we stay silent about issues. If Muslims have more impediments to integration then it can and should be discussed instead of shoving it under the rug in order not to "offend sensibilities".Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-19196678861884246342011-04-12T13:59:13.698+08:002011-04-12T13:59:13.698+08:00Just food for thought:
Since when is integration ...Just food for thought:<br /><br />Since when is integration a Muslim problem? Shouldn't it be a national problem? Why are Muslims being highlighted as the ONLY factor that impedes integration in Singapore? This is THE ACTUAL issue. <br /><br />Muslims are marginalised and put in the limelight for something that should have been EVERYONE'S responsibility to shoulder.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-57292076215717570142011-02-04T11:45:48.247+08:002011-02-04T11:45:48.247+08:00Hi, there. I see that you might be called a libera...Hi, there. I see that you might be called a liberal Muslim.<br /><br />It's nice to see that there are responses from your community that do not fall into the 3 categories I mentioned. I hope that there are more of your likes to change the minds of those more conservative ones.Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-78119766327349480962011-02-04T03:16:22.880+08:002011-02-04T03:16:22.880+08:00http://www.fateha.net/2011/02/truths-about-malay-m...http://www.fateha.net/2011/02/truths-about-malay-muslims-in-singapore.html<br /><br />my take!thumbelinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14763049399028698015noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4484360653507674234.post-82263719395463326402010-12-18T17:06:12.432+08:002010-12-18T17:06:12.432+08:00Agreed. Except I'm not sure how a strong athei...Agreed. Except I'm not sure how a strong atheistic position could be a core belief in a belief system.<br /><br />Let's set that aside and go back to what's the message of the post. It's not so much whether they are belief <i>systems</i> that's in question here but what the system consists of.<br /><br />A skeptical view (such as science) prevents dogma from taking hold so that we may adjust our view of reality in light of new evidence. Religion tend to do the opposite - they assert certainty where it is unwarranted. Religions do evolve but they do so usually in spite of their dogmas not because of them.Atheozoahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406794239052349494noreply@blogger.com