Your Inner Fish

Your Inner Fish
by Neil Shubin.



I got this book like 2 weeks ago but I haven't finished it yet because I'm slacking wayyy too much. Eeek.

In case, you didn't know: Neil Shubin and his team discovered the fossils of Tiktaalik in 2006. Tiktaalik represents an important transition from fish to the early tetrapods. To learn more about Tiktaalik, check out Wikipedia for some general information.

In the first chapter, Neil describes how the expedition was planned and how it went. Using the theory of evolution amongst other evidence that were previously unearthed, the team predicted the location, age and type of the rocks where the transitional forms from fish to tetrapod could be found.

Chapter 1: Finding your inner fish (pg.10)
...there is strong geological evidence that the period between 380 million to 365 million years ago is the critical time. The younger rocks in that range, those about 360 milion years old, include diverse kinds of fossiled animals that we would all recognize as amphibians or reptiles...... [amphibians] with their necks, their ears, and their four legs, they do not look like fish. But in the rocks that are about 385 million years old, we find whole fish that look like, well, fish. They have fins, conical heads and scales; and they have no necks. Given this, it is probably no great surprise that we should find evidence of the transition between fish and land-living animals.

And then they discussed where to find such rocks...

Chapter 1: Finding your inner fish (pg.15)
...three areas with Devonian freshwater rocks, each with a river delta system. First there is the east coast of Greenland. This is home to the Jenny Clack's fossil, a very early creature with limbs and one of the earliest know tetrapods. Then there is eastern North America, where we had already worked, home to Hynerpeton. And there is a third area, large and running east-west across the Canadian Artic.

It took four expeditions to Ellesmere Island spanning 6 years and they finally found Tiktaalik. A transitional form that have both features of fish and tetrapods.

Chapter 1: Finding your inner fish (pg.23)
Our new creature broke down the distinction between these two kinds of animals [fish and tetrapods]. But like early land-living animals, it has a flat head and a neck. And, when we look inside the fin, we see bones that correspond to the upper arm, the forearm, even parts of the wrist. The joints are there, too: this is a fish with shoulder, elbow, and wrist joints. All inside a fin with webbing.

And what else does Neil has to say about Tiktaalik?

Chapter 1: Finding your inner fish (pg.26)
How can I be so sure that this fossil says something about my own body? Consider the neck of Tiktaalik. All fish prior to Tiktaalik have a set of bones that attach the skul to the shoulder, so everytime the animal bent its body, it also bent its head. Tiktaalik is different. The head is completely free of the shoulder. This arrangement is shared with amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, including us. The entire shift can be traced to the loss of a few small bones in a fish like Tiktaalik.

The wonder of transitional forms.

The rest of the books describes the numerous evidence for evolution from fossils to cells and from genes to embryology. It's wonderful. I'd say it's a must read for those who enjoys an intellectual booster from various evidence neatly explained in the book (even for laymen readers).

Ignorance and Wilful Ignorance

Ignorance is defined by the dictionary as follows:

Ignorance [ig-ner-uhns]
The state or fact of being ignorant; lack of knowledge, learning, information, etc.

That is not, in itself, a bad thing.

Different people are ignorant about different things. Most people don't know the law as well as lawyers are, so in this aspect, most people are ignorant about the law in a general sense. We don't know everything about plumbering as well as plumbers are. We don't know engineering as well as engineers. We don't know about running businesses as well as businessmen.

And in general, the public does not understand science as well as scientists are. In fact, a physicist may be ignorant to some aspects of biology. Similarly, biologists may not know everything about cosmology as well as well cosmologists.

This is normal.

Not when we add wilfulness into the equation.

Wilful ignorance.
The state of knowingly ignoring something for no good reason.

In other words, being ignorant on purpose.

To some extent, this can be said of deniers of evolution. Many times, these cretins do not even bother to study what they reject. With the littlest understanding of the subject on hand, they criticise the theory without realizing their so-called objections are invalid/incorrect.

At some level, they could be victims of creationist propaganda where they are presented with a caricature of evolution. They reject the miscontrued version of the theory without realizing that they are merely rejecting a strawman.

Of course, this cannot be said about those who delibrately propagate the lies. They probably aren't just wilfully ignorant but outright deceitful.

Does the ends justify the means?
Is lying for god justified?

Jesus loves the little zygotes

I was listening to one of the past The Non Prophets show (7.3, 2 Feb '08) and I heard this.



Jesus loves the little zygotes

Jesus loves the little zygotes

all the zygotes of the world.
Jesus loves them until they're born
then abandons them forlorn.
Jesus loves the little zygotes 'til they're born.

Jesus loves the little children
all the children of the world.
Jesus gives them heart defects
measles, mumps, and ringwormed necks.
Jesus loves the little children of the world.

Jesus lets their parents beat them,
bruise their bodies black and blue.
Jesus gives them birth defects,
scurvy, ticks, and palette clefts.
Jesus loves the little children of the world.

Jesus gives the children cancer.
Earaches, lice, and scabies too.
Bowel obstructions, altered lips,
blighted brains and twisted hips.
Extra chromosomes to help them when they pray.

Hallelujah.

Jesus gives the children acne.
AIDS and leprosy galore.
Germs and worms of every kind.
Things to make the children blind.
But he cannot give them smallpox anymore.

Scientists and unbelievers
wiped the pox right off the earth.
Jesus still gives gifts to kids,
broken nose and burnt eyelids.
But he cannot give them smallpox anymore.

Just a nice little contrast between science and religion.

Oh and don't bother complaining about how Jesus don't give these stuff. He's god, go figure.

Meanwhile, take a look at the latest post at Unreasonable Faith. Another insight to biblical cherrypicking.

Science, it WORKS! Bitches.

Perhaps, I'm the bitch for this post because I'm going to be bitching about something.

I am definitely sick of theists who say "I believe in science but I just don't believe in evolution."

I'd say that they are fricking hypocrites.

Seriously, unlike the holy books, you don't get to cherrypick stuff to believe in. The body of knowledge known as science is acquired by the scientific method. It's a package deal. You don't get to reject part of this body of knowledge (in this case, the theory of evolution) and still say you accept the scientific method.

While science may have many disciplines, they are not discrete subjects like mathematics is separate from literature. They are interlinked. They are fundamentally the results of the same methodology: the Scientific Method.

To make matters worse, those theists are rejecting science for one absurd reason: their religious dogma. Between the multitudes of evidence science offers and their ancient religious dogma, they reject the evidence and the science.

That is patently absurd. And it is also incredibly hypocritical.

If you want to reject the theory of evolution, please be acknowledge that you are not rejecting the theory itself but the scientific method also. In such a case, do yourself a favor and stop being a hypocrite about it. Don't use anything that is derived from science and that includes evey piece of technology.

You are trampling on the hard work of the many generations of scientists who devoted their lives to bettering our lives by increasing our knowledge. You dare condescendingly call scientific theories "just a theory of man" and claim that it is wrong when it contradicts your holy book. You downplay all the good that science has brought and call it the evil that leads to nazism. Yet everyday you're using the products of the method that you so lovingly despise.

Why don't you examine your presuppositions? That god exist? That the universe must have been created? That you cannot bear the thought of death? That you want so badly to believe in an afterlife? That the holy books are accurate?

Use reason and logic.
Look at the evidence and draw conclusions.
Not let your desires cloud your judgement.

Screw faith which simply is the belief with no evidence.
Don't presuppose the conclusion when looking at the evidence.
Live a life based in reality not fantasy.

Trust science not simply as an authority.
Trust it because you know what it is and how it works.
Trust it because of its fine track record.

SCIENCE, IT WORKS! BITCHES!

The Atheist Experience: Clips on Youtube

The Atheist Experience videos are about 90 minutes long and that is way too long for some people to sit through. So some fans uploaded shorter clips of their favorite parts of certain episodes on Youtube. And here is a few that I picked out.


Does Logic And Reason apply to God?
What ever does it mean that you can't use reason and logic in issues regarding god(s)? Why is it applicable only if it comes to the biased conclusion? Why the particular exception anyways? This short clip touches on the topic.

Episode 531 | Topic: Viewer Mail | By Matt and Tracie

Click here.


Warning: Faith Can Cause Mental Illness!
Religious inconsistencies: Strong faith or mental illness?

Episode 535 | Topic: News | By Matt and Ashley
Click here.


Saudi woman sentenced to death for making a man impotent
Attacking religions: Is religion truly a force for good or is progress just a by-product of its ulterior motives. Stupid beliefs deserve criticism; No special protection accorded.

Episode 540 | Topic: Agnosticism & Prejudice | By Matt and Tracie

Click here.


Atheists don't believe in Anything!
Believe in nothing? Meaningless therefore suicide?
Bullshit! The promise of an afterlife diminishes the value of this one. As an atheist, I value this life much more and I hold my own beliefs apart from my disbelief in god. Not believing in god does not mean atheists believe in nothing; that's an extremely skewed perception of us.

Episode 556 | Topic: Batman & Atheism | By Matt and Tracie

Click here.


God's Moral Lesson in the Story of Abraham
Instead of focusing on Abraham's obedience, why not think about God's character? Ever wonder why Abraham never questioned why God wanted a sacrifice? Is asking for human sacrifices within God's character? How is that moral at all?

Episode 557 | Topic: John Hagee | By Matt and Don

Click here.


'I am more moral than God!'
God condones slavery. That is immoral. Period.
We are more moral than Yahweh.

Episode 568 | Topic: Moral Judgement | By Matt and Jen

Click here.


Logical Fallacy: God did it!
Argument from Personal Incredulity. Therefore, God did it.

Episode 573 | Topic: Moral Judgement | By Jen and Matt
Click here.


Matt Dillahunty DESTROYS a Theist
Matt's Terrific, Merciless Rant on God's moral standards

God moral? Have you read the damn bible?
An omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent god that: condones/requests for human sacrifice, endorses slavery, commits mass murders, requires death penalties for petty crimes and punishes his creations infinitely for finite crimes. That's moral?

Episode 574 | Topic: Still More Scamlets | By Matt and Don

Click here for Part 1 and Part 2.


13 Year Old Rape Victim Stoned To Death
13 year old. Girl. Married. Raped. Stoned for adultery. In stadium with a thousand watching. What's more to say?

Episode 577 | Topic: Still More Scamlets | By Jen and Martin
Click here.


God is the Ultimate Judge! - Another Great Rant
Moral judgement is within yourself. Don't sacrifice your humanity to this insane religion that claims to know the absolute truth and morals. Note: Watch this for your own character growth.

Episode 579 | Topic: Live Callers | By Matt and Tracie

Click here for Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3.


Distinct Evidence for God's Existence?
Evidence for anything must be unique in order to be recognized as evidence. An "evidence" that can be used for any god is not an evidence for any specific god. In some cases, theists go so far as to assert without evidence at all. Pathetic.

Episode 583 | Topic: Live Callers | By Matt and Tracie

Click here for Part 1 and Part 2.

Just a thought

I was watching Episode 594 of the Atheist Experience.

And Jen Peeples asked "So if you cloned yourself and then you have sex with yourself, is that incest or masturbation?"

LOL.

The Atheist Experience

I've been watching "The Atheist Experience" videos in their archives these past days. They are incredibly interesting to watch. Very informative and insightful. I learnt quite a bit from the videos I have watched so far.

In particular, I enjoy watching the episodes where Matt Dillahunty and Tracie Harris are hosting together. They rock the show in my opinion!

So I shall list a few of the videos that I found extremely interesting.

The Old Testament, Monotheism or Henotheism?
► Episode #464
► Episode #466
► Episode #483

On Consciousness
► Episode #500
► Episode #504

Skepticism and Children's books
► Episode #548
► Episode #552

What do you mean by "God exist?"
► Episode #572