Professor Richard Dawkins examines the growing suspicion the public has for science based medicine, despite its track record of successes like the germ theory of disease, vaccines, antibiotics and increased lifespan.
Atheist ▪ Skeptic ▪ Humanist ▪ Singaporean
Labels: Atheozoa , Creationism , Evolution , Religion , Science , Videos (Others) , Videos (Religion) , Videos (Science)
According to my brother, a teacher in his school spouted a logical fallacy in school with reference to the theory of evolution. She was trying to explain the usage of the word "relic" and somehow she touched on evolution. The following is paraphrased from my brother's memory.
Can you believe that scientists believe that we evolved from apes? That's so low life. We are superior beings.
Labels: Arguments , Creationism , Evolution , Ignorance
I guess I had too high of an opinion of Singapore. Or rather, of Singaporeans.
Our education system focuses much on applications when the subject of Science is taught. Sure, of course, application of our scientific knowledge is important. Very important indeed.
But I find that the appreciation of Science and the scientific method is very poor here in Singapore. I think that is important. Probably more important than the applications. The scientific method can be incorporated into our thinking and enable us to think more logically, more rationally and more critically.
How is that important? Lots of things. Basically anything that requires you think. Thinking critical might as well prevent you from getting conned by con-men. Keep you from falling prey to pseudoscience and superstition. Make astrological columns on newspapers disappear. There's more to it but I'll stop here.
I realized that creationism in Singapore is, well, pretty rampant. The ignorance of evolution here is utterly tragic (oh my, I seem to use this pretty often).
So, the gems of this entry: The "Gems" of Creationism.
"Evolution is flaw to me basically bcos there are too many missing link. Just the forming of an eyeball alone could make all evolution beholder dumbfounded."
"They don't understand humans are made in God's likeness, they chose to be the same category as animals using the pathetic (theory of) evolution created by man and yes, they believe they came from apes"
"do you believe man comes from ape?"
"But for apes to evolve into man.... hehe... it's just seems like a joke to me. And after so many years from the beginning of human history, why apes stopped evolving into man?"
how the animals world would need to have predators and prey to keep the system balance etc.
and earth which is fitted for the humans and animals to live in it.
if one day, an atheist were to ask me a question, you got a nice watch, where you got it from. I would answer, one day, suddenly there's a small explosion in front of me and this watch just appear. I believe he would agree with me too.
buy a cheap watch I suggest, and place it among Rolex and Omega, chances are it will evolved to become one of them.
(Theory of) evolution is not proven. If apes can turn into man, why did Ah Meng [This was a famous Orang Utan in Singapore] die still in a form of an ape? It's not just that simple, studying further and you will find evolution(ist) can't support their claims.
Labels: Creationism , Evolution , Ignorance , Singaporean
I finally understood what some of the forum-goers at the RichardDawkins.net forum meant when they found that believers are REALLY difficult to talk to.
Once believers presuppose the existence of god, it is impossible to get them to check the position. It's automatically thought to be correct and never questioned.
Worst of all, some do not question at all because of the implications of the position. It goes something like this:
God created everything. [Original assumption]
Hence, god created my intelligence/wisdom/knowledge as well.
Only god is perfect, I am not perfect.
Therefore, I am unable to understand god completely and thus, should never question him.
There.
Perfect.
They've just put themselves out of the reaches of any form of rational discussion.
Other times, it appears as though they are deliberately missing point. Any argument, explanation or analogy doesn't seem to work no matter how I try to phrase it.
My explanation skills must really suck, I guess. Gotta work on that, I think.
That was my conclusion after engaging in conversations on Stomp.com.sg. And one of which in particular involved a typical christian fundie. Even talking to cow would produce more results.
Not to forget, his utter and complete ignorance of evolution. Of course, that's not his fault. But to reject evolution because he was presented a creationist caricature of evolution? That's tragic.
Labels: About Me , Arguments , Christianity , Creationism , Forum
As a tribute to Darwin Day, today's entry shall be all about evolution.
Well, I shan't be the one doing all the talking (well, writing actually). I will leave the talking to several Youtube videos that addresses the subject of the day: Evolution.
If you want to read articles instead, TalkOrgins have quite a number of articles pertaining to the topic. Otherwise, check out the following videos!
How Evolution REALLY Works
► Part 1: Natural Selection
► Part 2: Selection and Mutations
Here's a two part series by cdk007. The first part is basically about the mechanism by evolution occurs: Natural selection. The second is about how natural selection weeds out deleterious (AKA bad) mutations and spreads the good ones around.
The Origins
► The Origins of Life - Abiogenesis
► The Origin of the Genetic Code
► The Origin of Sexual Reproduction
This is supposed to be a 5 part series by cdk007. However, only 3 has been completed so far. So let's enjoy those first. I believe the titles of each part is self-explanatory.
Evolution is REAL Science
► Part 1: Human Ancestry
► Part 2: Common Ancestry
► Part 3: Endogenous Retroviruses
This incomplete series by standup4REALscience explains facts in evolution along with the timeline of discoveries. Not bad, clear explanation with helpful diagrams & images.
Evidence for Evolution
► Part 1: Preservation of codons in closely related species
► Part 2: Phylogeny and predictions
► Part 3: Endogenous Retroviruses
This is another 3 part series by cdk007. This series touches on some of the evidence for evolution
Increasing Information in the Genome
► How Evolution cause an Increase in Information, Part I
► How Evolution cause an Increase in Information, Part II
Mutations only destroys information? Don't understand mutations at all? This 2 part series by cdk007 explains
Other miscellaneous video by cdk007
► The Evolution of Sex
► The Evolution of Irreducible Complexity
► The Evolution of Flagellum
Here's some videos dealing with evolution by cdk007. Check them out.
Foundational Falsehood of Creationism
► Part 1: Evolution ≠ Atheism, Creationism ≠ Christianity
► Part 2: Worshipping man-made holy books
► Part 3: Knowledge, Truth and Interpretations
► Part 4: Believing ≠ Knowing
► Part 5: "Evolutionism?" - Evolution is not a religion
► Part 6: Misunderstanding Evolution
► Part 7: Evolution is NOT random
► Part 8: Mislead about Mutations
► Part 9: Transition forms? There's plenty
► Part 10: Common Ancestry explained
► Part 11: Speciation: We've seen it
► Part 12: "Creation Science" is not science
► Part 13: Fabricating the lies that Evolution is fabricated
► Part 14A: Lying for God and creationism
► Part 14B: Lying for God and creationism
This series by AronRa is super interesting and informative. Though it deals mainly with the "controversy" with creationism but stringed along the series are lots of information on evolution. Watch it!
Labels: Evolution , Videos (Science)
Ahh... Interpretations. One of the favorite defense by believers for their holy books.
"You have misinterpreted that phrase."
"That's not the true meaning of that line."
"It's supposed to mean metaphorically."
"God didn't mean it that way."
"You need to go for bible study lessons."
Hmm... I supposed that these (from the Bible) and these (from the Koran) were misinterpreted as well?
Here's some questions to think about:
Why suppose that the holy books require "special interpretation"?
What makes certain people so special such that they are "authorized" to interpret "correctly"?
What's the reason for god to allow his/her/its holy book to be open to so many "misinterpretations"?
Does the holy books have little footer notes that say "interpret this metaphorically" or "this one is literal"?
In particular, the large amounts of lines in the Koran that advocate death for unbelievers, are they literal or metaphorical? If metaphorical, metaphorical for what?
Today, during class, there was a mini hooha over a phrase. It went something like that...Student (Christian): I am who I am.
Teacher (Also christian): No, you can't say that, you know?
*Brief pause*
Teacher: God said that. You're a christian so you cannot say that. The others can say that but you can't.
Me: *Rolls eyes*
First things first, that probably isn't exactly how it was said but it should be sufficiently accurate so as not to lose its original meaning.
Some might be thinking: So? What's the big deal?
You know what? There actually is.
The phrase "I am who I am" implies that the person who said that is the "uncreated creator" which is basically Yahweh (since it's Christianity we're talking about). Hence, the little hooha.
Okay, fine. Christians are not supposed to say that since that would be "disrespectful" to their god. But whatever does it mean that the others can say it?
Taken to worst of conclusions, it could very well mean: "They can disrespect god since they are going to hell anyway." Of course, I seriously doubted the teacher meant it that way so let's see the alternative reasons.
I'm thinking of religious pluralism or relativism. Vaguely, it means that all religions are equally valid. For some people, it may simply mean that my god (of my religion) takes care of me and your god (of your religion) take cares of you. People with polytheistic tendencies (perhaps, the chinese) would be more emphathetic to such an idea.
But unfortunately, religions typically claim that each is the one true path and thus make pluralism/relativism look like bullshit.
What other reasons might there be?
Labels: About Me , Christianity , God(s) , Religion
Looks like somebody is desperate for suicide bombers.Iraqi woman had 80 women raped to recruit suicide bombers
A WOMAN suspected of recruiting more than 80 female suicide bombers has confessed to organising their rapes so she could later convince them that martyrdom was the only way to escape the shame.
Seriously, what the fuck was she thinking? I mean, she IS a woman and she organized the rapes of 80 women.
This is what happens when you have ambiguous instructions from your "holy book".
Morality becomes a non-issue.
Labels: Absurdities , News , Religion
Copyright © 2007 -
Atheozoa
- is proudly powered by
Blogger
Illacrimo
- Design of
Design Disease
- To blogger by
Blog and Web